The woeful case of Jessi Slaughter proves one thing: you are never safe on the internet. Hell, you’re never safe on the street: should a hateful mob decide to rend you limb from limb there’d be little chance of stopping them. Still, it’s quite unlikely. There are people who’d be willing, yes, but they’re rare; scarcely meet; might be fazed by repercussions and, besides, would probably descend upon some other schmuck. On the internet, however, bullies don’t face punishment and can unite in the space of a few moment’s googling. You can only hope the baneful trolls don’t fix their gaze on you. Otherwise you’re screwed.
The woeful case of Jessi Slaughter actually proves two things. The term “hater” needs to be abandoned. It inspires the hated party to feel that their critics represent a validation of their work or demeanour. (See the luckless Jessi, or Paul Berman in the Wall Street Journal). No. At times the bubble of our self-esteem needs to be pricked. If your best response to critics is that they’re, er – critical, learn to hate thyself (well, not hate but – oh, Lord – now I’m doing it…).
July 28, 2010 at 10:48 am
suck my non-existent penis hater hater! (I actually have a penis)
July 28, 2010 at 2:59 pm
As someone who has an Internet stalker and at times has developed a wee legion of “haters”, I can tell you, it is not so much threatening and tedious.
It did show me that the Internet is a powerful tool to smear someone and how awfully easy it is to do so.
I’m surprised it doesn’t happen more often.
August 1, 2010 at 10:55 pm
My stalkers must be talented. I’ve yet to see them.
August 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm
[...] enmity. If you don’t hate girls and gays then you loathe the Yanks and Yiddish speakers. And, as we’ve explored, mere critics are now “haters” too. I’ve thrown out this charge myself: accusing, [...]